Jane vs. Mend
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Jane | Mend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 19 | 135 |
| Ease of use | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Ease of setup | 8.4 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.0 | 9.7 |
| NPS | 52.941176 | 83.809524 |
| Small Business | 89.5% | 52.6% |
| Mid-Market | 5.3% | 31.1% |
| Enterprise | 5.3% | 16.3% |
| Total page views | 383 | 11,843 |
| Total LLM citations | 6,126 | 2,532 |
Jane
Cloud-based booking platform which helps clinics with workflow management, practitioner management, scheduling, billing, patient record keeping, and documentation.
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Patient Communication
- User Interface
- Intuitive Use
- Patient Care
Mend
Patients rarely use portals, and EHRs were not designed to support the full patient journey. Mend solves both challenges by giving outpatient mental and behavioral healthcare organizations a fully integrated patient engagement platform that makes it easier for people to enter care, stay connected, and follow through with treatment. Mend is used by CCBHCs, Community Mental Health organizations, Substance Use and Alcohol Use treatment programs, group practices, and many other outpatient behavioral health providers with 25 or more caregivers.
- Communication
- Telehealth Services
- Product Satisfaction
- Appointment Scheduling
- Communication Efficiency
- Patient Communication