Humanly vs. Maki
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Humanly | Maki |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 129 | 131 |
| Ease of use | 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 9.8 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 84.251969 | 80 |
| Small Business | 24.8% | 33.3% |
| Mid-Market | 48.0% | 23.0% |
| Enterprise | 27.2% | 43.7% |
| Total page views | 1,092 | 379 |
| Total LLM citations | 4,355 | 2,405 |
Humanly
Humanly is the AI hiring platform for hourly, frontline, and high-volume recruiting teams. Most frontline hiring teams don't struggle with a lack of applicants — they struggle with speed, staffing continuity, and keeping qualified candidates engaged long enough to hire them. Humanly solves that by automating candidate engagement, screening, scheduling, and interviewing across chat, phone, and video — so a candidate who applies at 9pm is on your calendar by morning.
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Helpful
- Time-saving
- Communication
- Time Saving
Maki
Our vision is the intelligence running your hiring, end to end. HR was never built for impact: for decades it has run on legacy ATS and LMS systems designed to store records, not make decisions. Recruiters end up buried in manual screening, scheduling, and fragmented, unstructured candidate data, when they should be focused on engaging talent and making the case for who gets hired. Maki People changes that by combining validated assessment science with AI.
- Ease of Use
- Assessments
- Reporting
- Features
- Customer Support
- User Interface