Fellow vs. Lark
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Fellow | Lark |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 2,441 | 202 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Meets requirements | 9.1 | 9.4 |
| NPS | 81.028807 | 73.224044 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 48.7% |
| Mid-Market | 38.6% | 33.8% |
| Enterprise | 28.0% | 17.4% |
| Total page views | 2,617 | 2,758 |
| Total LLM citations | 22,223 | 24,739 |
Fellow
Fellow is the only AI meeting assistant built from the ground up with privacy and security at its core. With both bot and botless recording options, Fellow gives teams full control over how meetings are captured — whether through a visible meeting bot or seamless, native recording with no bot required. Every recording, transcript, and summary is protected by enterprise-grade privacy and access controls, ensuring only the right people see the right information.
- Ease of Use
- Meeting Notes
- Note-taking
- Action Items
- Organization
- Integrations
Lark
Built by ByteDance, Lark is an enterprise AI workspace designed for seamless human-agent collaboration. It unifies teams, communication, knowledge, and business workflows in one connected environment with an open architecture for AI models and agents. By bringing work into one place rather than scattering it across separate apps, Lark gives AI complete, real-time context and the native ability to act across the entire business. Today, organizations in more than 190 markets use Lark to turn AI into measurable business value.
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Team Collaboration
- Communication
- Daily Use
- All-in-one