G2 Vendor Directory

Docusign CLM vs. Conga CLM

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricDocusign CLM

by Docusign

Conga CLM

by Conga

Overall rating4.34.3
Review count503623
Ease of use8.98.4
Ease of setup8.57.8
Quality of support8.88.7
Meets requirements9.08.6
NPS55.98377347.245409
Small Business27.1%21.2%
Mid-Market45.7%40.5%
Enterprise27.1%38.2%
Total page views2,3015,475
Total LLM citations18,96010,841

Docusign CLM

While eSignature has changed the way that many organizations execute a contract, the lifecycle before and after signature is often managed through manual processes, spreadsheets, and emails—slowing the pace of doing business, increasing risk, and frustrating customers and employees. Docusign CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management) allows organizations to streamline the agreement lifecycle by transforming analog manual processes into a digital automated workflow. The end result is an accelerated pace of doing business, increased compliance, and more efficient employees.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Digital Signing
  • Digital Signatures
  • Document Management
  • Simple
  • Efficiency

Conga CLM

Conga CLM turns contracts into dynamic, data-rich assets that accelerate execution, reduce risk, and improve compliance. It unifies every contract and team in one system, centralizing data and embedding automation and AI-driven insights for smarter decisions. Built for industries like Healthcare and Life Sciences, Technology, Financial Services, and Manufacturing, Conga CLM meets organizations where they are and scales as needs grow.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Features
  • Efficiency
  • Contract Management
  • Integrations
  • Document Management