G2 Vendor Directory

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

Tenable Vulnerability Management

by Tenable

Overall rating4.34.6
Review count217153
Ease of use8.79.1
Ease of setup8.69.1
Quality of support8.98.5
Meets requirements8.89.1
NPS53.579.72028
Small Business6.9%16.3%
Mid-Market16.6%32.7%
Enterprise76.5%51.0%
Total page views3051,058
Total LLM citations1,0098,946

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

Pros

    Tenable Vulnerability Management

    Tenable Vulnerability Management provides a risk-based approach to identifying, prioritizing, and remediating vulnerabilities across your entire attack surface. Powered by Nessus technology and AI-driven analytics, it goes beyond CVSS scores to assess exploitability, asset criticality, and business impact—so you can focus on what matters most. With continuous visibility, automated scanning, and real-time risk insights, security teams can quickly expose and close critical vulnerabilities before they’re exploited.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Scanning Efficiency
    • Vulnerability Identification
    • Features
    • Automated Scanning
    • Solutions