Cisco Secure Access vs. Zscaler Private Access
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Cisco Secure Access | Zscaler Private Access |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 74 | 163 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 52.702703 | 62.025316 |
| Small Business | 24.3% | 22.3% |
| Mid-Market | 43.2% | 32.4% |
| Enterprise | 32.4% | 45.3% |
| Total page views | 401 | 1,271 |
| Total LLM citations | 177 | 9,554 |
Cisco Secure Access
Cisco Secure Access is a comprehensive solution that ensures secure access to networks and protects against unauthorized access. It is used for network authentication, enforcing access policies, managing user identities, securing remote access, and providing secure connectivity for devices. Users have praised its robust security measures, seamless integration with existing systems, user-friendly interface, and reliable network performance.
Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) is a cloud-based zero trust solution that securely connects users to private applications hosted in public clouds, data centers, or on-premises environments without relying on traditional VPNs or exposing them to the internet. Built on the principles of zero trust, ZPA ensures that users are authenticated and authorized before granting access, providing application-specific access rather than exposing the network.
- Security
- Ease of Use
- Secure Access
- VPN Efficiency
- Reliability
- Time-saving