Candidately vs. Maki
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Candidately | Maki |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 118 | 131 |
| Ease of use | 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 9.7 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 87.179487 | 80 |
| Small Business | 76.3% | 33.3% |
| Mid-Market | 21.2% | 23.0% |
| Enterprise | 2.5% | 43.7% |
| Total page views | 185 | 379 |
| Total LLM citations | 421 | 2,405 |
Candidately
𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 delivers a 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗹, 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜-𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿, and the ability for staffing teams to launch their own branded 𝗧𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲. From presenting top-tier candidates to enabling seamless client collaboration, real-time talent marketing, and actionable client insights, Candidately empowers staffing teams with everything they need to outpace the competition and accelerate placements.
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Time-saving
- Candidate Management
- Resume Management
- Customization
Maki
Our vision is the intelligence running your hiring, end to end. HR was never built for impact: for decades it has run on legacy ATS and LMS systems designed to store records, not make decisions. Recruiters end up buried in manual screening, scheduling, and fragmented, unstructured candidate data, when they should be focused on engaging talent and making the case for who gets hired. Maki People changes that by combining validated assessment science with AI.
- Ease of Use
- Assessments
- Reporting
- Features
- Customer Support
- User Interface