Azure Table Storage vs. Cassandra
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Azure Table Storage | Cassandra |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 17 | 35 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| NPS | 41.176471 | 33.333333 |
| Small Business | 52.9% | 17.1% |
| Mid-Market | 17.6% | 34.3% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% | 48.6% |
| Total page views | 101 | 79 |
| Total LLM citations | 64 | 136 |
Azure Table Storage
Azure Table storage stores large amounts of structured data. The service is a NoSQL datastore which accepts authenticated calls from inside and outside the Azure cloud.
- Data Storage
- Cost Efficiency
- Efficiency
- Usability
- Integrations
- Features
Cassandra
Cassandra's data model offers the convenience of column indexes with the performance of log-structured updates, strong support for denormalization and materialized views, and powerful built-in caching.