Cassandra

by The Apache Software Foundation

Reviews

4.1

Star rating

Rank in Wide Column Database

Pros and cons

Pros

Cons

Traffic & LLM citations

Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for Cassandra.

Page views and citations · Cassandra

Source: G2 review data

Winning from

Based on reviewers who said they switched from another product.

MySQL

2 switched

IBM Db2

1 switched

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)

1 switched

Oracle PeopleSoft

1 switched

Oracle Talent Management Cloud (formerly Taleo)

1 switched

Losing to

Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from Cassandra.

ScyllaDB

16 switched

EDB Postgres AI Database

1 switched

Amazon Keyspaces

1 switched

MongoDB Atlas

1 switched

Google Cloud BigTable

1 switched

Key stats

—

Enterprise

Adoption by company size

Segment	Share of reviews
Small Business	17.1%
Mid-Market	34.3%
Enterprise	48.6%

Quarterly history

Quarter	Reviews	Star rating
2024 Q4	1	4.5

Satisfaction ratings

Ease of Use8.1

Ease of Setup8.5

Quality of Support7.9

Meets Requirements8.6

What reviewers say

Works Smoothly

3.5

“Cassandra is a good choice for wide-column database. It's well documented, stable, with great compatibility with many apps , framework and repositories. And it has proven to be a very stable and good database engine.”

Software Engineer

Cassandra DB

5.0

“Cassandra is an open-source NoSQL database to manage a larger amount of data and the best possibilities for easy handling of data in unstructured form.”

DBA

Best NoSql Coloum Store Database

5.0

“Scalable Database Open Source Wide Community Support Blazing Fast Speeds The goodness of SQL with Enhanced CQL Can store huge amount of data Denormalization of the data gets rid of the painful joins”

Technical Associate