Azure Table Storage
17
Reviews
4.1
Star rating
#5
Rank in Wide Column Database
Pros and cons
Pros
- Data Storage
- Cost Efficiency
- Efficiency
- Usability
- Integrations
- Features
Cons
- SQL Limitations
- Scalability Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
-100.0%
41
Small Business
3
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 52.9% |
| Mid-Market | 17.6% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 2.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.7
Ease of Setup8.7
Quality of Support8.4
Meets Requirements8.9
What reviewers say
Fast and Low-Latency, but Less Efficient Than AWS
2.5
“It is a quick database & latency is low. It's easy to fetch the data from it.”
Great Cloud Storage Space
5.0
“It is the most amazing tool or platform to store and manage your resources while you can also club with other microsoft serivices.”
Efficient Data Management with Azure Table Storage
4.5
“Azure Table Storage is highly economical,especially for storing non-relational databases.It handles large amounts of data efficiently, making it ideal for many applications.”