ZAP alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches ZAP’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 IBM Armonk, New York, United States | 4.3 | 12,195 | -23.3% | 270 | Compare |
 Qlik Radnor, PA | 4.4 | 1,417 | -75.0% | 21 | Compare |
 Actian Corporation Palo Alto, CA | 4.1 | 245 | -100.0% | 6 | Compare |
 Fivetran Oakland, CA | 4.4 | 1,074 | +60.7% | 14 | Compare |
 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Seattle, WA | 4.4 | 18,060 | -68.4% | 196 | Compare |
 Sisense, Inc. New York | 4.2 | 1,073 | -90.9% | 3 | Compare |
 Panoply San Francisco, CA | 4.5 | 83 | — | 2 | Compare |
 Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) Tysons Corner, VA | 4.2 | 615 | -100.0% | 9 | Compare |
 Yellowfin Austin, US | 4.4 | 423 | -83.3% | 2 | Compare |
 Databricks Inc. San Francisco, CA | 4.6 | 1,388 | -93.1% | 16 | Compare |