Vultr
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in VPS Hosting Platforms
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Affordable
- Cost-Effective
- Deployment
- Pricing
- Features
Cons
- Poor Customer Support
- Limited Features
- Slow Performance
- Security Issues
- Payment Issues
- Latency Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 84.8% |
| Mid-Market | 10.4% |
| Enterprise | 4.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 3.2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 2.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Fast Setup and Flexibility Make Vultr Stand Out
“I use Vultr for hosting my "hot backup" data, and it helps me store backups in the same region as my AWS region. I really like the ease of use and how fast I can set up everything. The ability to spin up a 72 core 512GB RAM server or a 512MB server within 2 minutes is incredibly ”
Fraudulent behavior: Account verified, $100 taken, then banned within 24 hours.
“The user interface is clean, and the initial server deployment process is fast. They offer a wide range of locations and instance types, which makes it look like a professional and developer-friendly service at first glance.”
Misleading Tokyo latency - 0.14ms advertised, 2.7ms delivered
“Fast API for server provisioning - bare metal deploys in ~5 minutes. Good documentation and responsive support team. Competitive pricing for bare metal servers ($185/mo for Intel E-2286G). Clean control panel and straightforward billing.”