Trellix Data Loss Prevention
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Security
- Data Protection
- Ease of Use
- Monitoring
- Integrations
- Features
Cons
- Performance Issues
- Complex Configuration
- Slow Data Transfer
- Expensive
- Slow Performance
- High Resource Consumption
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 38.5% |
| Mid-Market | 33.9% |
| Enterprise | 27.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 3.7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 12 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Good DLP Visibility and Control but Requires Some Tuning
“What I like most is the level of control it gives you over DLP policies. I found it useful for setting different rules based on the type of sensitive data and where the data is being used or transferred. incident monitoring and reporting are easier to investigate potential data l”
Centralized Data Protection Control with Flexible Policies and Detailed Reporting
“What I like most about Trellix Data Loss Prevention is the centralized visibility and control it provides over sensitive data across endpoints and the wider organization. Its policy management is flexible, and it helps identify and prevent unauthorized data transfers through chan”
Strong Data Protection with Room for Easier Management
“What I like most about Trellix Data Loss Prevention is its strong data protection capabilities, along with centralized policy management and the ability to monitor and stop sensitive data from being shared through unauthorized channels. I also appreciate the reporting and visibil”