testomat.io
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Test Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
- Automation
- User Interface
Cons
- Complexity
- Testing Difficulties
- Missing Features
- Limited Features
- Editing Difficulties
- Learning Curve
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63.7% |
| Mid-Market | 34.1% |
| Enterprise | 2.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 11 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 3.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Testomat.io Keeps QA Documentation Organized and Testing Transparent
“I use Testomat.io to manage and organize our QA documentation and testing activities. Most of the time, I create and maintain test cases and checklists, track test execution, and keep test coverage clearly structured across different features and user flows. It also makes it easi”
Great platform for organizing and managing QA processes
“A very useful and modern platform for QA. I like the simple and clear interface, good organization of test cases, and pleasant work with test runs and reports. The service greatly simplifies the testing process and team collaboration.”
Clean, Easy QA Management That Streamlines Regression Testing
“Testomat.io has been a helpful tool for managing QA activities. It’s easy to use, the interface is clean, and organizing test cases is straightforward. It makes regression testing and tracking test execution much more convenient for the team. Overall, a solid solution for improvi”