Supabase alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches Supabase’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 MongoDB New York | 4.5 | 917 | -62.5% | 5 | Compare |
 Microsoft Redmond, Washington | 4.4 | 103,081 | -71.5% | 326 | Compare |
 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Seattle, WA | 4.4 | 18,060 | -68.4% | 196 | Compare |
 OutSystems Boston, MA | 4.5 | 1,810 | -98.4% | 5 | Compare |
 EnterpriseDB (EDB) Bedford, US | 4.4 | 258 | +85.3% | 5 | Compare |
 PostgreSQL United States | 4.4 | 683 | -90.9% | 1 | Compare |
 Apple Cupertino, CA | 4.4 | 8,122 | -79.7% | 27 | Compare |
 PingCAP Sunnyvale | 4.6 | 66 | — | 4 | Compare |
 Back4app Sunnyvale, CA | 4.8 | 73 | +800.0% | 6 | Compare |
 SAP Walldorf | 4.2 | 16,209 | -75.6% | 217 | Compare |