Xray Test Management
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Test Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Test Cases
- Organization
- Test Management
- Jira Integration
- Ease of Use
- Detailed Reporting
Cons
- Poor UI
- User Difficulty
- Time-Consuming
- Setup Difficulty
- Integration Issues
- Session Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26.3% |
| Mid-Market | 47.4% |
| Enterprise | 26.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 3.3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Xray Keeps QA and Developers Aligned for Better Product Quality
“Xray helps us align our tests with the development process, and it improves developers’ understanding of the quality parameters alongside their work, which ultimately brings better quality to our products. With Xray, each QA and developer clearly knows the expectations from one a”
Seamless Jira Integration That Streamlines Test Planning and Reporting
“What I like most about Xray Test Management is how smoothly it integrates with Jira. Having everything in one place makes test planning, execution, and reporting much more straightforward. I also appreciate that it lets me track requirements, manage test cases, and produce clear,”
Effortless Test Management with Powerful Organization Features
“The many options for organizing, executing, and reporting on test plans and results is the absolute best part about Xray Test Management. Implementation was extremely easy, with minimal settings and configuration required for initial startup. The complexity of options and uses ”