Testmo

by Sembi

Reviews

4.6

Star rating

#18

Rank in Test Management

Pros and cons

Pros

Integrations
Ease of Use
Organization
Test Cases
Jira Integration
Progress Tracking

Cons

Limited Features
Integration Issues
Limited Options
Automation Issues
Session Issues
Limited Customization

Traffic & LLM citations

Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for Testmo.

Page views and citations · Testmo

Source: G2 review data

Winning from

Based on reviewers who said they switched from another product.

TestRail

6 switched

Azure DevTest Labs

1 switched

Xray Test Management

1 switched

Losing to

Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from Testmo.

BrowserStack

1 switched

Key stats

—

Mid-Market

Adoption by company size

Segment	Share of reviews
Small Business	33.3%
Mid-Market	59.3%
Enterprise	7.4%

Quarterly history

Quarter	Reviews	Star rating
2024 Q4	2	4.8
2025 Q4	11	4.9
2026 Q1	1	2.5

Satisfaction ratings

Ease of Use9.5

Ease of Setup9.5

Quality of Support9.5

Meets Requirements8.8

What reviewers say

Organización y control excepcionales para QA con TestMo

5.0

“Es muy fácil de utilizar e intuitiva, ayuda al equipo de QA a tener una excelente organización en cuanto a ejecuciones de prueba y repositorio de escenarios”

QA Sr

Clean UI and Easy Migration, But Missing AI-Powered Features

5.0

“The clean UI, easy drag and drop and not complicated to migrate to.”

QA Software Engineer

Easy to Use with Great Support, But Testcase Sharing Needs Improvement

5.0

“Ease of use Multiteam support Customer support is on point, quick to respond to queries Automation has been easy to integrate with reporting Testmo has been used by all teams not just QA - business has an overview of work and bugs logged for feature testing”

Senior QA Engineer