ScalePad ControlMap
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in IT Risk Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Integrations
- Ease of Use
- SOC 2 Compliance
- Evidence Collection
- Dashboard Usability
- Security Management
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Learning Curve
- Difficult Learning
- Limited Functionality
- Limited Features
- Access Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37.3% |
| Mid-Market | 54.9% |
| Enterprise | 7.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Smooth Compliance Management, Needs More Niche Templates
“I like that ScalePad ControlMap helps prevent missed audit deadlines with its centralized workflow management, which is crucial for my compliance tasks. The initial setup went smoothly, making it easy to get started. Tracking compliance tasks and remediation activities is much mo”
Controlmap Simplifies ISO27001 and SMB1001 Compliance Management
“Controlmap has removed much of the complexity and difficulty from managing our ISO27001 and SMB1001 compliance.”
Easy Setup, Enhances Security Compliance
“I use ScalePad ControlMap to identify gaps in security control against frameworks like NIST and ISO 27001. It reduces the manual efforts involved in cybersecurity risk assessments, making my tasks more streamlined and efficient. The initial setup of ControlMap was smooth.”