Clinical Research Suite
205
Reviews
3.8
Star rating
#3
Rank in Clinical Trial Management Systems
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- User Interface
- Interface Clarity
- Features
- Data Management
- Intuitive
Cons
- Poor Navigation
- Missing Features
- Difficulty
- Slow Performance
- Data Management Issues
- Editing Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
—
7
Enterprise
4
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33.2% |
| Mid-Market | 12.2% |
| Enterprise | 54.6% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 155 | 3.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 13 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 3.6 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use7.9
Ease of Setup8.0
Quality of Support8.0
Meets Requirements8.1
What reviewers say
One platform to keep your research submission up to date.
4.5
“It is very easy to work with. There is a clear overview of documents. Only the co-authors who are selected, get notified about changes in status.”
Waardevol maar onoverzichtelijk
3.0
“Er wordt informatie verzameld m.b.t. verschillende onderzoeken. Hierdoor ontstaat een kennisplatform dat waardevol is. bovendien kan aangesloten worden bij verschillende onderzoeken, een waardevol iets!”
Works fast and efficient
4.0
“General overview and easy workflow It really helps to manage all research within our institute”