G2 Vendor Directory

OnCore CTMS

by Advarra

14

Reviews

4.4

Star rating

#1

Rank in Clinical Trial Management Systems

Pros and cons

Pros

    Cons

      Traffic & LLM citations

      Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for OnCore CTMS.

      Page views and citations · OnCore CTMS

      Source: G2 review data

      Losing to

      Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from OnCore CTMS.

      1

      Motive

      1 switched

      Key stats

      +100.0%

      57

      Enterprise

      1

      Adoption by company size

      SegmentShare of reviews
      Small Business14.3%
      Mid-Market28.6%
      Enterprise57.1%

      Quarterly history

      QuarterReviewsStar rating
      2026 Q214.0
      2026 Q324.0

      Satisfaction ratings

      Ease of Use8.3
      Ease of Setup7.8
      Quality of Support9.0
      Meets Requirements9.0

      What reviewers say

      OnCore for Clinical Trial Managment

      3.5

      “I liked that you can customize roles in the staff list, instead of just using preset defaults. The branching for task management, process tracking, and notifying the next signatory authority when it is time for them to completed their part is all very easy to navigate, saves a lo”

      Tobacco Treatment Specialist

      Excellent resource for researchers

      4.0

      “That patients on clinical trials calendar's can easily be viewed and manipulated if need be.”

      Research Assistant