codebeamer
141
Reviews
4.3
Star rating
#3
Rank in ALM Software
Pros and cons
Pros
- Traceability
- Cloud Services
- Flexibility
- Tool Integration
- Integrations
- Features
Cons
- Complexity
- User Difficulty
- Not Intuitive
- Difficult Learning
- Expertise Requirement
- Complex Configuration
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
-100.0%
50
Mid-Market
2
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22.0% |
| Mid-Market | 51.1% |
| Enterprise | 27.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.3
Ease of Setup8.0
Quality of Support8.6
Meets Requirements8.7
What reviewers say
codebeamer:Robust Traceability and Integration.
5.0
“What I appreciate most about Codebeamer is its robust end-to-end traceability and effective requirements management. It effortlessly links development, testing, and compliance processes, which makes it particularly well-suited for industries with complex regulations. Additionally”
Code Beamer for Automotive Technical Requirements
4.0
“Best for managing Technical Requirements , Adding Software Tasks, Test cases”
Best software for maintaining customer requirement
3.5
“It is best use to add comments from each stakeholder and its integration with other apps”