Progress Kemp LoadMaster
213
Reviews
4.7
Star rating
#5
Rank in Load Balancing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Load Balancing
- Easy Setup
- Simple
- Reliability
Cons
- GUI Improvements
- Difficult Setup
- Complex Configuration
- Expensive
- UX Improvement
- Limited Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
—
80
Mid-Market
2
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9.6% |
| Mid-Market | 53.1% |
| Enterprise | 37.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 46 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 17 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 12 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use9.2
Ease of Setup9.0
Quality of Support9.3
Meets Requirements9.3
What reviewers say
Progress Kemp loadmaster works
4.5
“It worked and balanced the traffic loads, and we can create rules.”
Straightforward Load Balancer with Room for Improvement
3.5
“I find Progress Kemp LoadMaster straightforward and easy to configure. I also like the performance monitoring tools and built-in templates, which give me a quick glance into virtual service health and connection volumes so I can spot issues.”
Interfaz Intuitiva con Balanceo Eficiente
5.0
“Me gusta que Progress Kemp LoadMaster sea una herramienta bastante intuitiva y de fácil uso. Sus interfaces son muy amigables y no hay pérdida al usarlas. Además, la configuración inicial fue bastante sencilla e intuitiva.”