Port
41
Reviews
4.4
Star rating
#4
Rank in Internal Developer Platforms
Pros and cons
Pros
- User Interface
- Flexibility
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Customization
- Customer Support
Cons
- Integration Issues
- Poor Documentation
- Slow Performance
- Limited Customization
- UX Improvement
- Complex Configuration
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
—
54
Mid-Market
4
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4.9% |
| Mid-Market | 61.0% |
| Enterprise | 34.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 26 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 4.1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.7
Ease of Setup8.3
Quality of Support9.1
Meets Requirements8.5
What reviewers say
I like the tool, we're just scratching the surface.
3.5
“Port has been helpful in giving us a catalogue for our cloud resources, we're working through the integrations to go from our code source, cloud resources, CI/CD pipelines.”
Port is Flexible and Easy to Integrate
4.0
“Port enables organizations to create a very flexible data model that represents their SDLC and organization, while also the ability to import and map data to that structure very quickly.”
One of the best (if not THE best) platforms on the market
4.5
“Freedom to define your own blueproint to match your needs Flexible AWS data import using Ocean”