Phrase
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Computer-Assisted Translation
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive
- Features
- User Interface
- Translation Efficiency
- Simple
Cons
- Translation Issues
- Interface Issues
- Poor Interface Design
- Expensive
- Poor Usability
- Pricing Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 60.6% |
| Mid-Market | 26.7% |
| Enterprise | 12.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 29 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 31 | 4.2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 17 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 16 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 24 | 3.9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 15 | 4.1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 39 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 50 | 4.7 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Easy-to-Use CAT Tool, Held Back by Awkward Shortcuts
“I find Phrase easy to use and user-friendly. I think it’s easy to set up, and after using more than 10 CAT tools, I think Phrase is the best.”
Easy Day-to-Day Translation and Localization Work
“Ease of use when handling day-to-day translation and localization work.”
Studio-Like Online Tool with Handy Find-and-Replace and Clear Term Matches
“I think it’s great because it propagates 100% matches, just like Studio does. The find-and-replace function is handy and easy to use, and the terms previously added to the TB are easy to spot when I use them. Overall, it’s similar to Studio, except this one is an online tool.”