memoQ
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Computer-Assisted Translation
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Features
- Integrations
- Translation Services
- Easy Integrations
Cons
- Limitations
- Interface Issues
- Slow Performance
- Not User-Friendly
- Complex Workflow
- Poor Usability
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 67.7% |
| Mid-Market | 16.9% |
| Enterprise | 15.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 20 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 16 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 4 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
The Best CAT Tool I’ve Used in 30 Years—Ideal Workflow and Great Compatibility
“The work flow is ideal; it's the best CAT tool I have seen in 30 years as a freelancer. It also works very good with files from other CAT tools, such as Studio. I love it when my clients use memoQ too, via memoQ server.”
All-in-One Translation Workflow That Boosts Speed and Consistency
“What I like most is how it brings different translation resources together in one workflow. Translation memories, term bases, LiveDocs, concordance search, and predictive typing can make the translation process faster and more consistent. I also appreciate the clear project manag”
Great Value and Reliable Stability Compared to Competitors
“Cost-benefit is better than other mainstream competitors. Does not crash nearly as often as other desktop CATs.”