G2 Vendor Directory

NetSPI

by NetSPI

18

Reviews

4.9

Star rating

#11

Rank in Penetration Testing

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Expertise
  • Team Quality
  • Ease of Use
  • Service Quality
  • Communication
  • Clear Interface

Cons

  • Poor Interface Design
  • Information Management
  • Poor Navigation
  • False Positives
  • UX Improvement
  • Navigation Problems

Traffic & LLM citations

Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for NetSPI.

Page views and citations · NetSPI

Source: G2 review data

Losing to

Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from NetSPI.

Key stats

-100.0%

94

Mid-Market

8

Adoption by company size

SegmentShare of reviews
Small Business22.2%
Mid-Market38.9%
Enterprise38.9%

Quarterly history

QuarterReviewsStar rating
2026 Q224.8

Satisfaction ratings

Ease of Use9.6
Ease of Setup9.8
Quality of Support10.0
Meets Requirements10.0

What reviewers say

Thorough Testing and Professional, Helpful Team

5.0

“Testing was thorough. They confirmed all the requirements and limitations well before the actual run happened and kept up-to-date as it was proceeding. Both the testers and the project managers are very helpful and professional.”

Senior Staff Engineer

NetSPI Streamlines the Full Penetration Testing Cycle with a Great Team

4.5

“The NetSPI platform that tracks all the phases of the penetration testing cycle. Plus the people there are great to work with!”

Director of Product Management for Security

Clear Security Findings and Easy Remediation Process

5.0

“What I like most about NetSPI is how clearly they communicate security findings and provide detailed, actionable reports. Their team is responsive and makes it easy for developers to understand vulnerabilities and address them effectively. The entire process is straightforward, w”

Lead Solutions Architect