Azure Traffic Manager
18
Reviews
4.4
Star rating
#6
Rank in Load Balancing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Setup Ease
- Cost Saving
Cons
- Slow Performance
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
—
53
Enterprise
1
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11.1% |
| Mid-Market | 27.8% |
| Enterprise | 61.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use9.4
Ease of Setup9.6
Quality of Support9.5
Meets Requirements9.5
What reviewers say
Azure is providing a comprehensive package for all solution with clear documentation
4.5
“Setting up the server According to user needs, can be modified later at bare minimum cost. Providing complete guide for setting dependencies.”
Friendly to configure, helps for geo distribution of your loads
4.5
“Capability to add application URLs hosted in any Cloud Platform or On-Premises Network.”
Awesome Experience in implementing traffic manager for Geo applications
5.0
“I have implemented a traffic manager for our geographic distributed application. Using routing traffic manager profiles we successfully access the application with out any latency.”