Mercurial
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Version Control Software
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54.8% |
| Mid-Market | 35.5% |
| Enterprise | 9.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
powerfull and portable
“In contrast to comparative apparatuses (Git), Mercurial is extraordinarily simple to utilize and cleaned. It gives you the advantage of running a _distributed_ variant control framework without the issue of waiting be a direction line master. On Mac, both I and the group utilized”
Elegant version control - simpler than Git, yet as much powerful!
“Quite easy for beginners to get hands-on experience with version control HTTPS- or SSH-based flexible authentication Simplified branching for hassle-free feature developments and version management Extension system for incrementally enabling advanced features Most com”
Powerful yet easier to use and administer than Git
“Ease-of-use when performing operations like branching, merging, rebasing, reverting file changes, stripping commits, access control to files and branches based on user names and groups. Besides that, it's very well written (in Python), modular, and easy to extend / modify.”