Matrix Req
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Requirements Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Integrations
Cons
- Feature Limitations
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 61.1% |
| Mid-Market | 29.2% |
| Enterprise | 9.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 3.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 39 | 4.4 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
The compliance checker adds useful structure
“The compliance checker is a useful way to compare project content against the standards and checklists that matter to us. It helps surface areas that may need attention rather than relying entirely on manual review at the end of the project.”
AI features are useful without taking control away from the team
“The AI assisted features are helpful for speeding up tasks such as drafting requirements, identifying gaps and supporting risk work. What I like is that the team still reviews and approves the output, so AI is an accelerator rather than a replacement for engineering or quality ju”
Review and approval workflows are a real time saver
“The controlled review and approval process is much better than emailing document versions around the organisation. We can see what is current, who reviewed it and how items have changed. Electronic approvals and audit history help keep the process controlled without slowing the t”