Logically
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Reference Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Useful
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Helpful
- User Interface
- Time-Saving
Cons
- Usage Limitations
- Slow Performance
- Limited Features
- AI Limitations
- Expensive
- Learning Curve
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 89.0% |
| Mid-Market | 7.5% |
| Enterprise | 3.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 13 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 1.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 1.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Terrible experience at Logically
“The app logically is easily replaced by NotebookLM. Save yourself the money and use Google's free notebook LM. Affora AI aka Logically ... I had a terrible customer service experience with Logically. Raised prices from $10 to $15 to $30 per month for exactly the same service. ”
Intuitives Design und schnelle Forschung, jedoch begrenzter Funktionsumfang
“Ich mag das intuitive Design und die Geschwindigkeit von Logically. Auch die Anbindung an wissenschaftliche Datenbanken und die API ist sehr gelungen.”
Buen comienzo, mal final
“Entre las aplicaciones de uso académico, Logically (anteriormente Afforai) inició su camino con buen pie. Mostró un desarrollo activo y lanzó nuevas funcionalidades de forma continua. Su asistente de investigación, unido al manejador de referencias, era una forma cómoda de poder ”