TeamCity
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Configuration Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Features
- Testing
Cons
- Downtime Issues
- Poor Interface Design
- Confusing Interface
- Slow Speed
- Expensive
- API Limitations
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26.7% |
| Mid-Market | 42.2% |
| Enterprise | 31.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
TeamCity makes a strong case against the potential of science and ingenuity to advance civilization
“It has basic features that meet a non-zero percentage of our testing needs.”
Team City Overview
“1. It gives us an opportunity for continuous integration of UNIT CASES 2. It gives us an opportunity for continuous DEVELOPMENT of UNIT CASES 3. It gives us an opportunity TO RUN OUR SYSTEM INTEGRATION TEST in pipeline using automation 4. It gives us an opportunity to run on ”
TeamCity is an all-purpose continuous integration, continuous delivery appliocation
“It supports .net framework and is exceptionally reliable tool for freshers entering devops, you can run it on any operating system. Integrates with build/test tools seamlessly and keeps a record of history. Multiple Integrations with 3rd Party Applications like : JIRA - To ta”