IBM Planning Analytics
272
Reviews
4.4
Star rating
#2
Rank in Demand Planning
Pros and cons
Pros
- Efficiency
- Planning Efficiency
- Analytics
- Forecasting Accuracy
- Ease of Use
- Flexibility
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Learning Difficulty
- User Difficulty
- Difficult Learning
- Complexity
- Technical Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
+9.1%
56
Enterprise
9
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15.6% |
| Mid-Market | 35.6% |
| Enterprise | 48.9% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 20 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 39 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 11 | 4.2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 3.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 12 | 4.4 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.4
Ease of Setup7.9
Quality of Support8.3
Meets Requirements8.8
What reviewers say
Modern, Up-to-Date Tech That Elevates Finance Planning
5.0
“Planning Analytics uses modern, up-to-date technology to support finance planning.”
Planning and Budgeting at finger tips
4.0
“Best Planning for financial data, integration with Cognos analytics.”
Clear Step-by-Step Workflows with Time-Saving Drag-and-Drop
5.0
“Undoubtedly, the key benefit is the clarity it brings to implementing a workflow step by step, using turbointegrator processes to integrate information from a datawarehouse, applying business rules to prevent users mistakes and finally, the interface prevents wasted time because ”