Fontastic alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches Fontastic’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Envato Melbourne | 4.1 | 240 | -100.0% | 6 | Compare |
 Adobe San Jose, CA | 4.5 | 62,749 | -77.9% | 137 | Compare |
 Monotype Woburn, MA | 4.2 | 206 | -100.0% | 3 | Compare |
 Corel Corporation Bellevue, WA | 4.2 | 1,588 | -80.0% | 15 | Compare |
 Inkscape Chino Hills, CA | 4.4 | 416 | -100.0% | 2 | Compare |
 Sketch B.V. Eindhoven, Netherlands | 4.5 | 1,227 | -80.0% | 5 | Compare |
 Cedar Lake Ventures Excelsior, MN | 4.4 | 95 | -100.0% | 1 | Compare |
 Recraft San Francisco, California | 4.7 | 456 | -98.1% | 4 | Compare |
 Plasfy Canberra, AU | 4.5 | 79 | -100.0% | 1 | Compare |
 YouWorkForThem Knoxville, US | 4.3 | 13 | — | 1 | Compare |