FigJam
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Diagramming
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Simple
- Team Collaboration
- Real-Time Collaboration
- Brainstorming
Cons
- Limited Features
- Performance Issues
- Slow Performance
- Missing Features
- Not Intuitive
- Limited Templates
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49.1% |
| Mid-Market | 34.7% |
| Enterprise | 16.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Perfect for Remote Collaboration
“Map out user flows, and collaborate with my team. It's a great space to sketch thoughts, get feedback, and keep everyone on the same page without any confusion.”
Fast, User-Friendly for Visual Collaboration
“I use FigJam for collaborations and Zoom calls, and it's very visual for product processes. I appreciate that FigJam loads much faster than Figma and doesn't intimidate newcomers using this type of visual editor for the first time. I also like that it loads quickly and offers a f”
My Go-To Tool for Creating Flowcharts and Designs
“FigJam is easy to use and makes collaboration feel natural. I like that teams can brainstorm, map ideas, leave comments, use templates, and turn rough thoughts into clear visual workflows quickly. The real-time collaboration is smooth, and the integration with Figma makes it espe”