EnterpriseDB (EDB) alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches EnterpriseDB (EDB)’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 PostgreSQL United States | 4.4 | 683 | -90.9% | 1 | Compare |
 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Seattle, WA | 4.4 | 18,060 | -68.4% | 196 | Compare |
 SQLite San Francisco, California | 4.3 | 262 | -100.0% | 1 | Compare |
 Oracle Austin, TX | 4.1 | 19,663 | -55.7% | 232 | Compare |
 IBM Armonk, New York, United States | 4.3 | 12,195 | -23.3% | 270 | Compare |
 Aiven Helsinki, Southern Finland | 4.3 | 368 | +0.0% | 5 | Compare |
 Microsoft Redmond, Washington | 4.4 | 103,081 | -71.5% | 326 | Compare |
 Quest Software Austin, TX | 4.3 | 884 | -29.1% | 26 | Compare |
 MongoDB New York | 4.5 | 917 | -62.5% | 5 | Compare |
 Teradata Autonomous Knowledge Platform San Diego, CA | 4.3 | 374 | -100.0% | 9 | Compare |