Edgescan
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Vulnerability Detection
- Vulnerability Identification
- Customer Support
- Features
- Automated Scanning
Cons
- UX Improvement
- Limited Customization
- Poor Interface Design
- Slow Performance
- Complex UI
- Confusing Interface
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.5% |
| Mid-Market | 32.1% |
| Enterprise | 43.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 12 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 20 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 7 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Effortless Setup, Trusted Vulnerability Scanning
“Edgescan is great for its simplicity and the ability to quickly add a new endpoint for authenticated application vulnerability scanning, complete with verified findings. It reduces the number of false positive findings, which increases trust with technical teams and leads to good”
Simple UI, Strong Cybersecurity Reporting, and Extremely Helpful Support
“Edgescan is a really simple UI interface with optionality for different levels of reporting on cybersecurity risks & their customer support is extremely helpful, the performance is very strong with regular reporting & alerting to issues which allows us to act promptly and integra”
EdgeScan Delivers Invaluable Continuous Scanning and Insightful Trend Reporting
“We have been a long term EdgeScan customer - coming up on 15 years. The ability to have continuous vulnerability scans conducted and the ability to do as hoc scans when changes are made is invaluable. The trend reports over time and time to resolve issues are useful factors for K”