Qodo
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Secure Code Review
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Time-saving
- Functionality
- Helpful
- Automation
- Speed
Cons
- Testing Issues
- Slow Performance
- Learning Curve
- Bug Issues
- Poor UI Design
- Poor Reporting
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 59.3% |
| Mid-Market | 25.2% |
| Enterprise | 15.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 20 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 1.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 60 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Great Cross-Repo PR Insights, Though Severity Flags Can Miss the Mark
“It's feature for cross repo awareness in my code and analysing things in PR and raising flags according to the priority”
A useful extra review layer when coding with AI tools
“The confidence it adds to code review process while using AI tools like claude or cursor especially when working on a security-sensitive, HIPAA-compliant application. One feature I found particularly useful was its ability to highlight function complexity, including cyclomati”
A Huge Help for Code Reviews, Bug Catching, and Pull Requests
“It helps me a lot at work, reviewing my code and catching bugs, including dependencies and cross-file behaviour. I have been using tools like Copilot, and working with them has been helping me. They can also help me with GitHub and pull requests, so not also check bugs and help m”