CKEditor

by CKSource

Reviews

4.3

Star rating

Rank in WYSIWYG Editors

Pros and cons

Pros

Cons

Traffic & LLM citations

Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for CKEditor.

Page views and citations · CKEditor

Source: G2 review data

Winning from

Based on reviewers who said they switched from another product.

Slate

WordPress.org

Quill

Scribe

Losing to

Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from CKEditor.

Essential Studio

2 switched

TinyMCE

2 switched

Key stats

—

Small Business

Adoption by company size

Segment	Share of reviews
Small Business	60.6%
Mid-Market	24.2%
Enterprise	15.2%

Quarterly history

Quarter	Reviews	Star rating
2024 Q4	1	4.0
2025 Q1	1	3.0
2025 Q2	1	5.0
2025 Q3	1	5.0
2025 Q4	3	4.8
2026 Q1	1	4.0

Satisfaction ratings

Ease of Use8.7

Ease of Setup8.3

Quality of Support8.6

Meets Requirements8.7

What reviewers say

Intégration Facile et Support Réactif, Mais Prix Élevé et Fonctions Payantes

4.5

“Nous avons utilisé CKeditor dans le cadre du développement d’un workflow média interne. Les fonctionnalités intégrées de CKeditor nous ont permis de renforcer la collaboration entre utilisateurs grâce au plugin de commentaires, et nous ont également permis d’intégrer nos propres ”

CTO

CKEditor Angular integration ek smooth aur powerful WYSIWYG editing experience deta hai.

5.0

“Classic edtor, and Inline editor I like most, and there we override built-in ckeditor classes ,and modify UI according UX.”

Frontend Web Developer

It was a sweet experience

5.0

“Ease of integration into my frontend application. I could manipulate it as much as I want”

Software Engineer