Check Point SandBlast Advanced Network Threat Prevention
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Network Sandboxing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Easy Integrations
- Features
- Integrations
- Installation Ease
- Speed
Cons
- Cost
- Expensive
- High Resource Usage
- Slow Performance
- Incomplete Information
- Limited Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5.6% |
| Mid-Market | 66.7% |
| Enterprise | 27.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Quiet, Proactive Protection That Delivers Peace of Mind
“Check Point SandBlast Advanced Network Threat Prevention is the way it quietly shields our environment from complex attacks without disrupting daily work—it feels reliable, proactive, and gives me genuine peace of mind knowing threats are stopped before they can even surface.”
Solid performance and strong security reliability over the year
“Simplicity of rules for run tests in the sandbox, fast time for determine a decision. Integration with the rest of Checkpoint ecosystem.”
Check Point SandBlast acts like a great wall against zero-day attacks .
“The most favourable feature is that Checkpoint Point Sandblast is very accurate and gives a almost no false positives, it has great threat prevention against severe zero day attacks.Great TAC team support.Deployement is easy.”