carbmee EIS
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Carbon Accounting
Pros and cons
Pros
- Integration Capabilities
- Integrations
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency Improvement
- Reporting
Cons
- Time Consumption
- Missing Functionality
- Expensive
- Integration Issues
- Poor Customer Support
- Slow Loading
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10.5% |
| Mid-Market | 10.5% |
| Enterprise | 78.9% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Automated Scope 3 calculations, and the ability to scale supplier engagement
“Automation of calculating Scope 3 emissions, ability to scale the use of PCF's, ability to integrate supplier specific data, and the ability to engage suppliers from Tier 1 and beyond, and the intelligent use of AI to identify relevant emission reduction opportunities. The suppor”
Great tool to map CO2 emissions in the value stream
“Clear functionality, well structured approach. Intuitive tool, easy to work with. Strong support from the Carbmee team.”
Carbon Accounting and Emissions Analysis - One in all tool
“carbmee EIS offers a user-friendly interface and a broad set of features that support carbon footprint analysis. The Studio module enables direct data interaction without the need for spreadsheet exports, improving efficiency. Its modular structure allows for tailored reporting, ”