Kilter
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Network Automation Tools
Pros and cons
Pros
- Automation
- Ease of Use
- Backup
- Time-saving
- Features
- Backup Management
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Learning Curve
- Complexity
- Lack of Features
- Slow Performance
- Usability Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32.7% |
| Mid-Market | 28.1% |
| Enterprise | 39.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 4.2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 12 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 12 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 16 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 21 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 12 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Backbox is great and love it for the price
“The price as well as the functionality is great and allows us to do so much more with automation.”
Easy-to-Use Firewall Backups with Great Support
“I like Kilter's ease of use and support. The backup tool is currently the most valuable feature for me because it automates firewall backups for our clients. The documentation seems to work well, and the initial setup was pretty simple, with no complaints.”
Our reliable network backup automation
“I appreciate BackBox for its automated firmware update engine, which can perform multi-vendor updates with precision. The platform also performs disk space and checksum checks before deploying binary images, which adds a layer of reliability. I also value the custom scripting fea”