Axolo
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Peer Code Review
Pros and cons
Pros
- Review System
- Collaboration
- Tool Integration
- Team Collaboration
- Ease of Use
- Code Review
Cons
- GitHub Issues
- Improvement Needed
- UX Improvement
- Notification Issues
- Integration Issues
- Merge Conflicts
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 76.0% |
| Mid-Market | 23.0% |
| Enterprise | 1.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 8 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Axolo Keeps PR Reviews Simple and Seamless in Slack
“With a high volume of PRs, it can be hard to keep up. Axolo helps me stay on top of my own PRs and the PRs I need to review, and it integrates seamlessly into Slack, where we do all of our communication. I love being able to confidently check the status of code changes without ha”
Axolo Gets PRs Merged Faster and Gives Your Team Hours Back
“Every hour a PR author is blocked from merging a PR, is another hour your team could be getting back. Axolo gets you those hours back.”
Streamlined PR Management with Excellent Slack Integration
“Axolo creates a GitHub-synced channel per PR, which has streamlined our communication and collaboration immensely. The single source of truth being Slack has reduced missed notifications and made discussions more approachable and productive. I also appreciate how Axolo minimizes ”