Astro by Astronomer
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Workload Automation
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency Improvement
- User Interface
- Automation
- Reliability
- Deployment Ease
Cons
- Expensive
- Learning Difficulty
- Learning Curve
- Technical Issues
- Feature Limitations
- Difficult Learning
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13.4% |
| Mid-Market | 47.8% |
| Enterprise | 38.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 21 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Efficient platform for managing Airflow
“I use it on a daily basis to manage Airflow environments efficiently. It simplifies Airflow orchestration with an intuitive interface and easy deployment. It’s well-documented, stable, and saves time when managing environments.”
Excellent Application with Open Accessibility for Support Engineers.
“I appreciate the UI improvements and the ability to access run statistics. Although I haven't had the opportunity to develop directly on Astro, the integration between GitHub and Astro provides me with all the information I need to carry out my responsibilities as a product suppo”
Efficient DAG Monitoring, Needs Improved Stability
“I find Astro by Astronomer easy and fast for identifying tags in Airflow. The filter feature allows me to search for DAGs across different environments efficiently. I appreciate the overall experience with its simple UI, and how it helps me switch deployments and find everything ”