AWS CodeCommit
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Version Control Software
Pros and cons
Pros
- Integrations
- Cloud Services
- Collaboration
- Security Protection
- Scalability
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Cost Management
- Complexity Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49.4% |
| Mid-Market | 29.9% |
| Enterprise | 20.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 2.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Secure, Low-Overhead AWS Repo Manager—Great Integration, But AWS Lock-In
“As a DevOps Engineer, I would like to use it as a secure repository manager in AWS, with very little infrastructure to manage because it’s handled by AWS itself. The tight integration with other AWS services makes it easy and secure to use, such as IAM and CodePipeline for deploy”
Perfect Security for Git Repo Commits
“The security works perfectly with my git repository to commit code”
An Amazing Fully managed source control service
“It is an amazing service to host my source code and its intergation with various other services like codebuild, codepipleline. To build CICD pipelines and Build docker images using source code.”