xMatters vs. Checkly
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | xMatters | Checkly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 801 | 33 |
| Ease of use | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 71.611253 | 72.727273 |
| Small Business | 15.3% | 63.6% |
| Mid-Market | 27.1% | 21.2% |
| Enterprise | 57.6% | 15.2% |
| Total page views | 2,216 | 264 |
| Total LLM citations | 5,125 | 5,234 |
xMatters
xMatters end-to-end incident management platform automates each step of the incident lifecycle—from event to resolution—reducing the frequency, duration, and cost of critical service disruptions. xMatters Purpose-built AI significantly slashes resolution times with seamless integration across any DevOps or ITSM toolchain, ensuring every team has the necessary context to avert disruptions before they occur. We partner with our customers to create workflows that lower MTTA/MTTR, increase customer and employee satisfaction, and improve compliance and reporting.
- Alerting System
- Ease of Use
- Alert Management
- Automation
- Notifications
- Integrations
Checkly
Checkly allows engineers to write their E2E monitors as they write their cloud-native application, as code. Powered by the Checkly CLI, engineers code, test, and deploy API and Playwright-based checks from their code repository. Checkly's programmable Monitoring as Code (MaC) workflow seamlessly integrates with modern development practices, tools, and frameworks, at a fraction of the cost of legacy testing and monitoring solutions. The end result?
- Easy Integrations
- Monitoring
- Integrations
- Monitoring Services
- Alerting System
- Ease of Use