X-CD vs. Universe
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | Universe |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 10 | 27 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 100 | 59.259259 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 74.1% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 7.4% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 18.5% |
| Total page views | 134 | 103 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 1,011 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
Universe
We understand that creating a great event is no easy feat–we’re here to help with our network of 6.3 M users and world-class products. We provide valuable insights to reach and engage more fans and ultimately sell more tickets.