Trace vs. Workiva
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Trace | Workiva |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 15 | 2,268 |
| Ease of use | 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 9.8 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 9.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 100 | 67.437722 |
| Small Business | 60.0% | 15.2% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 28.4% |
| Enterprise | 6.7% | 56.4% |
| Total page views | 192 | 7,669 |
| Total LLM citations | 606 | 30,912 |
Trace
Leading Australian companies use Trace to meet their ASRS and AASB S2 reporting obligations with confidence. Trace brings together purpose-built software and expert-led delivery, from climate risk assessments to emissions data to assurance-ready disclosures, so reporting is accurate, repeatable and audit-ready.
- Sustainability
- Features
- Innovation
- Analytics
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive
Workiva
Workiva Inc. (NYSE:WK) is on a mission to power transparent reporting for a better world. We build and deliver the world’s leading regulatory, financial, and ESG reporting solutions to meet stakeholder demands for action, transparency, and disclosure of financial and non-financial data. Our cloud-based platform simplifies the most complex reporting and disclosure challenges by streamlining processes, connecting data and teams, and ensuring consistency. Learn more at workiva.com. Follow Workiva on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/workiva Like Workiva on Facebook: www.facebook.com/workiva
- Ease of Use
- Collaboration
- Team Collaboration
- Features
- Reporting
- Efficiency