Tiger Data vs. Fauna
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Tiger Data | Fauna |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 32 | 25 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.0 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 8.4 |
| NPS | 68.75 | 56 |
| Small Business | 78.1% | 64.0% |
| Mid-Market | 18.8% | 24.0% |
| Enterprise | 3.1% | 12.0% |
| Total page views | 481 | 31 |
| Total LLM citations | 5,519 | 85 |
Tiger Data
Tiger Data, from the creators of TimescaleDB, is the #1 Postgres time-series database for developers, devices and agents. Keep sensor, on-chain, and customer data fresh while retaining years of history, all queryable in standard SQL. For IoT, Web3, and AI. Why teams choose Tiger Data: - Trusted by thousands of developers. 3M+ active databases, 2k+ customers - Up to 95% Compression. Keep years of history online at a fraction of the cost. - Production-ready without the operational pain. Multi-AZ HA, PITR, cross-region backups, SOC 2/HIPAA/GDPR, deep observability. - Scale effortlessly.
- Ease of Use
- Easy Setup
- Setup Ease
- Performance
- Analytics
- Speed
Fauna
Fauna is a truly serverless operational database that empowers teams to ship applications faster. It combines the flexibility of a document model with the strong consistency and rich querying power of relational systems—all built on a serverless, distributed architecture that scales automatically, without the complexity of manual provisioning, sharding, or replication. Over 80,000 development teams choose Fauna to build and scale modern transactional applications including teams from Tyson Foods, Unilever, Lexmark, Intelliculture, Hannon Hill, Cloaked, DTLR, and Insights.gg.
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
- Flexibility
- Reliability
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support