Fauna
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Document Databases
Pros and cons
Pros
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
- Flexibility
- Reliability
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
Cons
- Difficult Learning
- Limited Storage
- Expensive
- Unclear Pricing
- Inefficient Search
- Limited Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 64.0% |
| Mid-Market | 24.0% |
| Enterprise | 12.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Serverless cloud database for the web
“It's managed, serverless, and highly scalable. The ability to write typescript like queries, and have all the reads and updates be globally consistant is amazing. The ease of projecting extra data greatly reduces the need for round-trip queries which makes everything that much mo”
Set and forget database
“Highly reliable, scalable and low latency serverless database. Its document-based renational schema makes it highly flexible for different use cases.”
No Infrastructure, NoSQL, No Complaints
“We don't have to manage any infrastructure, the cost scales with us The FQL X syntax is very similar to TypeScript, which means we don't have to develop across different paradigms (frontend, backend, and database all use the same syntax) Schema management built-in means we don'”