G2 Vendor Directory

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs. IBM QRadar EDR

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricTenable Vulnerability Management

by Tenable

IBM QRadar EDR

by IBM

Overall rating4.64.2
Review count15347
Ease of use9.18.7
Ease of setup9.17.7
Quality of support8.58.4
Meets requirements9.19.1
NPS79.7202844.444444
Small Business16.3%44.7%
Mid-Market32.7%40.4%
Enterprise51.0%14.9%
Total page views1,05857
Total LLM citations8,9464

Tenable Vulnerability Management

Tenable Vulnerability Management provides a risk-based approach to identifying, prioritizing, and remediating vulnerabilities across your entire attack surface. Powered by Nessus technology and AI-driven analytics, it goes beyond CVSS scores to assess exploitability, asset criticality, and business impact—so you can focus on what matters most. With continuous visibility, automated scanning, and real-time risk insights, security teams can quickly expose and close critical vulnerabilities before they’re exploited.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Scanning Efficiency
  • Vulnerability Identification
  • Features
  • Automated Scanning
  • Solutions

IBM QRadar EDR

IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.

Pros

  • Threat Detection
  • Ease of Use
  • Cybersecurity
  • Detection Efficiency
  • Protection
  • Monitoring